Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. To what extent to you agree or disagree. Argument
With the losing significantly of money valuable, many stuffs increase their price considerably even university fees. In addition, the number of universities in local incline in the recent years; thus, the competition of jobless are more intense. some people argue that schools need to drop out some uneseccery subjects such as: arts, philosophy and history, instead of improving their college academic skills. Although students have more time focusing to their study, there will be a huge disadvantage if they do not learn the subjects, especially philosophy. As many other main subject, arts, philosophy and history play an importance role which are very useful for them in the future.
some people said art school is more available to teach art rather than applying that subject to student who do not have gifted about art. these opponent, however, just see in one side. Even though art do not earn any money when they just learn a basic stuff, they can improve themselves in difference ways like metal development. For example, art can develop their virtual intelligent that is very advantage when they learn and imagine. also, adding art in their schedule is a good way for them to relax because people recently focus in their phone as an only relax way they can think of. Joining in art class can separate them from device, they can make more friend and improve their focusing as well, because they need to patient for a long time when they do art.
The second opponent is that philosophy and history are those subjects that heavily theory and hardly to apply it to reality; therefore, their major subjects are much more important. however, these subjects can help colleges having deep knowledge about their countries. In philosophy, students can learn what type of political they live on, how that type run, and how to take advantage it effectively. For example, businessmen need to learn not only law subject to protect their own business but also philosophy to create their own strategy when they work in labour market. In history, many people think that it just a tool to remind people about some popular person, but learing history learn about their stories that can considerate an experiment for us that do not need get trouble again.
In short, all of those three should study as well as the major ones. personally, these subject can improve their skills more fluently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | aria etemadi | 67 | view |
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. To 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for you 56
- the chart below gives information on the global sale of hybrid vehicle 33
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in USA spent and received in one year. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- An interesting number of people today change their career and place of residence several times during their life. Is this a positive or negative development? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ompetition of jobless are more intense. some people argue that schools need to drop ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... very useful for them in the future. some people said art school is more availabl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...udent who do not have gifted about art. these opponent, however, just see in one side...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
... advantage when they learn and imagine. also, adding art in their schedule is a good...
^^^^
Line 3, column 767, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tient for a long time when they do art. The second opponent is that philosophy a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...major subjects are much more important. however, these subjects can help colleges havin...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 773, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to get'?
Suggestion: to get
...e an experiment for us that do not need get trouble again. In short, all of thos...
^^^
Line 9, column 70, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personally
...should study as well as the major ones. personally, these subject can improve their skills...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in short, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.985 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46165467724 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4181861538 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.777777778 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141886301322 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048998987463 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368008776432 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861236521645 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424502304986 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.