The bar charts illustrate the alterations and differences in the average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA.
The pie charts compare 4 typical meals consumed in the USA in terms of the amount of 3 unhealthy nutrients: sodium, saturated fat and added sugar in average.
Overall, breakfast contains the least amount of 3 unhealthy substances. In addition, dinner is represented with the largest proportion of sodium and saturated fat.
The largest proportion of sodium and saturated fat is witnessed in dinner, with 43% and 37% respectively, while only 23% of added sugar was in dinner. Whereas, Snacks is represented the largest percentage of added sugar with 42%, which double than the amount of saturated fat with 21% and only 14% of sodium.
The percentage of all 3 substances are the sam in breakfast. added sugar and saturated fat each account for 16%, which is higher slightly than the figure for sodium (14%). in terms of Lunch meal, the proportion of sodium, saturated fat and added sugar are 29%, 26% and 19% accordingly.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-13 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
2019-12-23 | thanhthanh211 | 61 | view |
2019-05-09 | Spring2019 | 84 | view |
- the charts below show the proportion of people's spending on different commodities and services in a particular European county in 1958 and in 2008 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 61
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- the two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990 73
- The pie charts below show the avarage household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed fat and added sugar in average. Overall, breakfast contains the least am...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtion of sodium and saturated fat. The largest proportion of sodium and sat...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t with 21% and only 14% of sodium. The percentage of all 3 substances are t...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 62, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Added
... 3 substances are the sam in breakfast. added sugar and saturated fat each account fo...
^^^^^
Line 25, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...lightly than the figure for sodium 14%. in terms of Lunch meal, the proportion of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13548387097 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73984740227 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490322580645 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9198326138 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387717058708 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180180184862 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123646596289 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262782483502 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120869670831 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.