The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The given line graph reveals what percentum of visitors to England who visited to four various marvellous destinations in brighton within three decades (from 1980 to 2010).
A quick look at the line graph is quite enough to make it clear that in initial year 1980 festival was much fascinating. However, in 2010, pavilion became the priority among the tourists.
In the analisation of spectacular places in Brighton, majority of the travellers was attracted towards festival that was one third of the total comers in 1980. Art gallery and pavilion both were stood at second rank with analogous viewers percentage (just over one fifth) in the same year. At the same time, only one tenth of the visitors were interested in pier. Five year later,festival and pavilion touched the similar proportion (25%). Whereas, in case of art gallery and pier, there was 19 and 5 per cent increment in the viewers respectively.
Moving further, festival was witnessed of stability until 2010. In contrary, exponential surgement and downfall was seen in pavilion and art gallery tourists that were approached at one third and under one tenth consecutively in 2010. The trend of pier was completely unique which was going in the direction of sky with slow pace and crossed one fifth in 2010
- The table below gives information about a restaurant's average sales in three different branches in 2016. 61
- The chart illustrates the percentage of male and female executives in six different types of profession across the UK in 2007 59
- The bar chart gives the top eight online activities in Slovakia in a given month 89
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- In many countries people tend to move overseas or move to a different part of their country after their retirement Discuss why they do so and what the outcome of this sitation is 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'viewers'' or 'viewer's'?
Suggestion: viewers'; viewer's
...ere stood at second rank with analogous viewers percentage just over one fifth in the s...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , festival
...were interested in pier. Five year later,festival and pavilion touched the similar propor...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00471698113 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69319382645 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594339622642 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2021672533 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4545454545 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125035006619 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440211321551 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777216824332 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997436004819 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101806494106 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.