The graph below shoes the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line chart presents information on the amount of fish and various meat consumed by the European nation from 1979 to 2004, a 25 year time-period.
In general, by 2004, chicken had witnessed a sharp increase, while beef and lamb had a significant decline and fish had fallen slightly.
In 1979, the consumption of beef per person per week was the highest, at around 220 grams. The amount of lamb was 150 grams in 1979, which was marginally higher than chicken at that time. However, after a few years, the consumption of chicken skyrocketed and first saw the highest amount in 1989 just under 200 grams, while the figure of beef had a downward trend. Similar to beef, lamb had also experienced a decrease by almost 100 grams by 2004.
Compared to the above three types of meat, the amount of fish fluctuated relatively more stable. From 1979 to 1984, it decreased just about 20 grams and reached a plateau for the later 20 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
- Should teenagers in high school work part-time? Give reasons and examples to support your answer. 11
- Nowadays, more people are migrating to other countries than ever before. In order to become integrated into society in their adopted countries, immigrants should abandon their old ways and adapt to local customs and codes of behavior.Do you agree or disag 78
- It is inevitable that as technology develops so traditional cultures must be lost. Technology and tradition are incompatible - you cannot have both together.To what extent do you agree with this view? 61
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77575757576 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49174210063 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6442629081 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155245277857 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693519588094 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493742236584 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102383566357 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508900683379 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.