Genetic modification
The reading and the lecturer are both about the use of genetic trees. The author of the reading feels that there are three advantages on using genetic change to improve the growth of trees. The lecture challenges the claim made by the author. He is of the opinion that these advantages are faulty.
To begin with, the writer mentions that use trees that are genetic modified might be more resistant under severe conditions. The article gives an example of a new papaya trees that were developed to resist an infection of virus that had damaged the native papaya tree population. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. The professor mentions that a particular type of new tree might survive under the attack of insect or severe climate but not all of them.
Secondly, the author suggests that this new type of trees brings a large number of economic benefits once the investment made by farmer will return faster. The lecture, however, refute the claim by mentioning that the costs of these tree is really high because various tests needs to be done before they plant the seeds, and also because the farmers have to pay for a company that had developed these seeds every time they will plant it.
Third, the article mentions that genetically modified trees might reduce deforestation of native trees once they are use to made firewood. In contrast, the lecturer`s position is that using this kind of trees damages might increase once they grow in a aggressive way. He also notes that genetically modified trees will compete water, sun light and nutrients with native trees.
- work in a team or alone 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 60
- Genetic modification 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- work in a team or alone 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... change to improve the growth of trees. The lecture challenges the claim made by th...
^^^
Line 9, column 66, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ests that this new type of trees brings a large number of economic benefits once the investment m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 118, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...restation of native trees once they are use to made firewood. In contrast, the lect...
^^^
Line 13, column 253, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a aggressive way" with adverb for "aggressive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s damages might increase once they grow in a aggressive way. He also notes that genetically modifie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 256, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...amages might increase once they grow in a aggressive way. He also notes that gene...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, third, in contrast, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94423791822 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42734704024 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524163568773 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8697797937 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.307692308 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0976972365881 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046473999602 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604127143143 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685654419074 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497369321551 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.