economical gap between the rich and poor is widening.
The importance of the economical gap between the rich and poor is widening which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impavt in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are some myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that rich people is successful in life and rich peole is very enjoyful in life. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that rich people becuase there are many opportunities for jobs because there are more educated as compare to the poor people. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that poor people is uneducated as compare to rich people so poor people are face defficulties in own life. Besides, poor people have rare opportunities for jobs. Hence, it is apparent why mant are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the drawbacks og rich and poor people is wideninh are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | yamatos | view | |
| 2020-01-09 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | dharmpreet | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | Majheal Singh | 72 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...logical conclusion. There are some myriad of reasons which will further explain t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14728682171 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72971703421 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554263565891 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3656468867 50.4703680194 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199822285453 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652285250166 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818601519452 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118305830597 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224613550758 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.