in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today

Essay topics:

in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today

Whether there will be a decrease in the utilization of vehicles in future or not has been a matter of argumentation among people for a long time. On one hand, some individuals concede that there will be more cars as a result of an increase in the manufacturing of vehicles. On the other hand, others believe that there will be fewer cars since people will be eager to use other transportation machines. From my point of view, I acknowledge the latter idea in spite of the fact that the former one is more acceptable and has more aficionados. My answer to this debating question is twofold. In the following, the rationale behind my choice will be elaborated by the most outstanding and solid proofs.

First of all, I concede that public transportation will be used more for the trips inside a city owing to the problem of parking spaces. Researchers of automobile industry have realized that there will be a dramatic decrease in free spaces of metropolitans inasmuch as most of the spaces will have been used for buildings and sky scrapers. As an illustration, Tehran's citizens never drive their own cars to work inasmuch as there is not usually enough parking lots near their work locations. Notwithstaning, governments ought to finance related infrastructures more if they want to encourage their inhabitants to use public transportation. As a demonstration, there is not enough public transportation means in Kerman city, so its citizens have to use their own cars even though they want to help their city.

Secondly, as generations X, Y, and Z are growing and contributing to their cities and countries, these men and women tend more to save their planet by reducing carbon emissions. One way of doing that is by not using their own automobiles. Australian scientists in RMIT University undertook a survey and disseminated a questionnaire among adolescents. The results showed that young generation tend to limit the utilization of cars in order to save their plant from the air pollution perspective. Additionally, they found that the use of private cars will have been decreased at least for 10% by the end of 2050. My younger brother, for instance, rides his bicycle where ever he wants to go since he believes that this muddy planet is his own heirloom and must be preserved for his future offspring. Conversely, "boom" generation does not care as much as these generations to this issue. They think they must advantage from this universe as much as they can; thus, topics like "saving the planet" is not a vital concern for them.

In conclusion, according to the abovementioned rationalizations and facts, I recognize that there will be a drastic decrease in car usage, in comparison with today's circumstances. The increase in public transportation as well as the tendency of new generations in saving the earth, by means of decreasing their private transportation, are two main assumptions of this bone of conception. Nonetheless, this issue is really convoluted and one person cannot have an exact anticipation of the future as there are many different factors which are affecting the car usage, so it is completely accepted if others have diverse opinions.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-14 Astha101 70 view
2023-07-14 Astha101 66 view
2023-06-23 YasamanEsml 76 view
2023-04-13 sonyeoso 76 view
2023-04-08 prakriti malla 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 510, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...anticipation of the future as there are many different factors which are affecting the car usa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, nonetheless, really, second, secondly, so, thus, well, at least, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2675.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 529.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05671077505 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16339167015 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502835538752 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 846.9 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6121022753 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.590909091 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0454545455 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.68181818182 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238660558538 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736108715628 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785078499 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153292042884 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673337566174 0.0645574589148 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.