Do you agree or disagree
our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations.
The debate on whether today's methods of living will affect the next generation negatively or not has garnered a range of views. Nowadays, many are adamant that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration to check the constructive and destructive facets of this issue. Some people posit that now we are living in a way that may have unfavorable results in the future. On the other hand, some others take the opposite side and disagree. From my vantage point, I agree with the former group. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
The first exquisite point to be considered is the possible negative impact on our ecosystem. Since the 1900s, technology development has increased the number of factories all over the world. Unfortunately, This augment of factories' population is destroying the environment. A plethora of conundrums has appeared in our ecosystem from air pollution which results from factories' emission to the deforestation problem. A vivid example that can shed light on this subject is one from my country. Since last year, the government of my country has started cutting the trees in my city to open new malls. Although the idea of a new mall in my city may have a positive impact on our society, the deforestation process is a huge problem that may affect the ecosystem in my city for many generations.
Secondly, another reason which deserves some words to say is the augment of the poverty level in communities. In a narrow condition, poverty has climbed noticeably for a couple of decades. Consequently, the economic gap between wealthy and poor people will exacerbate the security level in societies. From rubbery to murder crimes, all kinds of crimes will appear in the community due to poverty at present. For instance, my country is facing some economic problems which affect negatively the prosperity levels here. As a reason for that, the number of crimes has witnessed climbing. All in all, poverty nowadays will create an insecure community in the future.
To warp it up, contemplating all aforesaid reasons, one can soon realize that our current lifestyle will harm the future generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Barana | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | JohnSmith96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | JohnSmith96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
- A huge marine mammal known as Steller's sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see one. In 1768 the animal became 80
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should keep trying to reach their goals even if they seem impossible to achieve Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 70
- Venus surface and the planet s atmosphere made up mostly of carbon dioxide nitrogen and sulfuric acid contains hardly any oxygen or water vapor Water and oxygen would therefore probably have to be supplied to Venus from Earth The idea of ensuring a regula 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in today s world have become too dependent on automobiles Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...son which deserves some words to say is the augment of the poverty level in communities. In...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04696132597 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84740709692 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549723756906 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0274825297 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2380952381 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144917130358 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368519148621 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399866688172 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888240181474 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316766396396 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.