the ownership of cars should be restricted traffic congestion and pollution.
The importance of the ownership of cars should be restricted to reduce traffic congestion and pollution which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. However, the substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. So, this essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that the traffic congestion is increasing day by day in the world and people face many difficulties. Consequently, many people face problem due to pollution like as asthma and there are many problems that are faced by people. Another pivotal aspect of trend is that with the increase in transportation the problem of traffic, pollution and overcrowding are also increasing.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that some people think that the government should be restricted one car to each and per family. Besides, government should take more decision to solve this problem and individuals do not face these difficulties.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the drawbacks of the ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution are indeed too dire to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-29 | vanessagalvis90 | 65 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 75 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | vijaymehta31 | 80 | view |
- A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation Do you agree or disagree 82
- music is very important 72
- The world is facing many problem and one of them is poverty. what is the best solution you can think to fix the issue. 85
- numerous prefer more fast food and snacks. 77
- economical gap between the rich and poor is widening. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, however, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23484848485 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89371875646 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.206840821 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.2 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282834251919 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108660195103 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123256066089 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190584111922 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097523108017 0.0609392437508 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.