It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Ever since the twenty first century took place, there has been a colossal upsurge in the debate of getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. Some intellectuals asset that it is a good choice but others are against this notion. The point of contention is described here under to form a plausible stance.
To set the wheels into motion, there are multifarious reasons behind in this statement. Primarily, the most evident and distinctive one stem from the fact is that when getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice because they do not focus on their career. Secondly, another underlying, salient and remarkable feature is that they have not lack of knowledge and they lead unsuccessful in future.
To continue with it, i think getting married before finishing school or getting a job is good for individual because they spend money according to their own needs. They are getting self dependent. However, sometime they have financial problems due to this they want a job or getting married to early. If they have financial problem they do not studied and their career is unsuccessful. They have no lack of knowledge.
To encapsulate, after pinpointing and bolstering all the points above, it is clear that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice is not good for individuals because a people can gain only success in life for lack of knowledge and good skills.
- Playing games is fun only when you win. do you agree or disagree with the statement. 77
- human behaviors can be limited by laws 11
- The only thing that interferes with my learning is education Einstein 80
- Do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school 84
- the importance 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-first
Ever since the twenty first century took place, there has been a co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'intellectuals'' or 'intellectual's'?
Suggestion: intellectuals'; intellectual's
...etting a job is not a good choice. Some intellectuals asset that it is a good choice but othe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...of knowledge and they lead unsuccessful in future. To continue with it, i think gett...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 22, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ul in future. To continue with it, i think getting married before finishing ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91235059761 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66721686572 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517928286853 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.9259528994 50.4703680194 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375708840949 0.242375264174 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141202133358 0.0925447433944 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146593058579 0.071462118173 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259859985378 0.151781067708 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330519526523 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.