Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
it is argued that the amount of recycled domestic waste is low so governments need enact a new law in order to compel their dwellers recycling. While I have to admit this perspective is accurate to somewhat extent. I still hold a notion that we have many measures increase the quantity of household waste is recycled.
On the one hand, the suggestion of adopting a legislation to force people recycle their domestic waste is the promising method. this is to sat the legal measures make behaviour of people become more self-awareness. Therefore, this improves the attitude of inhabitants about recycling waste and alters a treat routine in the environmental protection also the sustainable development of society. Moreover, the enforcement of legal requirement is widely and quickly incidence as it has supporting of authority system.
On the other hand, others who are in favour of education is one of solutions to deal with domestic waste release environment without recycling. As a matter of fact, when people take responsibility, the legislation of recycling abide by more effective. In particularly, in every educational institutions, teacher have well-trained for their learners recycling household waste, which advances general knowledge of citizens and increases the number of people protecting environment and ecosystem. Besides, this policy will cause negative impact on low-income people. As a result of this mean, poor people will bear the burden of responsibility from money penalties which make them feel anxiety and uncomfortable to carry out policy.
To recapitulate, although the obvious benefits of legislation bring for people and environment, I strongly convinced that governments ought to combine more than one method in order to attain the best results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- These days, a great number of children prefer spending time on computer games rather than on sports. Why it is a positive or negative development? 84
- The best way to ensure the growth of children is to make parents take parenting courses Do you agree or disagree 81
- the graph below shows electricity production (in terawatt hours) in France between 1980 and 2012 73
- Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees while others have free entry Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to scotland who visited four different attraction from 1980 to 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is argued that the amount of recycled d...
^^
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...der to compel their dwellers recycling. While I have to admit this perspective is acc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...domestic waste is the promising method. this is to sat the legal measures make behav...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, in particular, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47101449275 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16299159942 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601449275362 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0651646363 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.153846154 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333985769372 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103536495751 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642826845983 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184498124518 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626261837497 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.