Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.
In today's progressive world, no one can turn a blind eye to the significant effects of technological advancements on children's performance. Some are inclined toward the opinion that playing computer games is a waste of time. On the other extreme of the rope, others hold the opposite of view. Although both sides take their own positions, personally speaking, I firmly believe that the first group is a fallacy. In the following paragraph, I will cogently explain my reasons to justify my points of view.
As the first and paramount reason, playing computer games enables children to extent their knowledge in technology. In other words, playing computer games has been preparing kids to understand more about internet and how to find viable solutions for a problem. Nowadays, internet and advanced computers approaches to deal creatively with children problems and unprecedented challenges in their lives. For instance, my brother, who is always playing computer games is very creative. Moreover, his performance in making originative methods to analyze data and charts has been enhanced surprisingly. Therefore, computer games can provide for children a creatives ideas and consistent improvement they show in their perfomance.
The second reason coming to my mind to substantiate my view point is that children who play computer games are exposed to notions of modern technologies. To be more specific, play games that can improve your mental capability will provide the comprehension of others ideias and methods efficiently and change and apply them creatively. For example, experimental research conducted by some cognitive scientific at a university shows correlation between children who playing computer games with increase of creativity and motor skills. For this reason, playing computer games can not be seen as a waste of time.
In conclusion, taking the above reasons into account, I strongly believe that children who play computer games can extend their knowledge and encourage them to think creatively, but also opens a whole gamut of new ideas and personal ability.
- Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 60
- TPO9 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile s main source of p 3
- TPO13 Question Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93530075674 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575384615385 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0834416439 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329612686972 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121992248919 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940246215943 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207946775232 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756289826377 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93530075674 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575384615385 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0834416439 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329612686972 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121992248919 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940246215943 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207946775232 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756289826377 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.