The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by different sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010.
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of electricity was used in eight different fields in Eastern Australia in two the year 2007 and 2010.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that while the amount of electricity consumed by other metals experienced an increase, the opposite was true for Manufacturing and Aluminium. Additionally, the figures for residential and commercial were by far the largest.
In 2007, residential areas spent 28% of total electricity, a little lower was 23% of electricity was expended for commercial purposes. There was 13% of the power consumed by manufacturing and aluminium, whereas the data for other metals and mining were slightly below, at 12% and 9% respectively. By contrast, electricity consumption from transport and agriculture made up only negligible figures.
Over the three years ensuing, the percentage of electricity used by other metals rose insignificantly to 18%, while those of aluminium and manufacturing fields saw a slight decrease to 11% and 9% sequentially. Interesting, the rate of electricity consumed by the other sectors were all as similar as initial figures.
- The line graph below gives information about the percentage of women aged 15 64 in employment between 2003 and 2009 78
- The media should include more stories which report good news To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 95
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 84
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46590909091 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3070915226 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6525809524 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216685895692 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906388049887 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758869281185 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139137456928 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780899999493 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.