Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
These days, a group of individuals have faith in that more and more options are available for human beings. I would agree with this opinion to a large extent. My inclinations are elaborated in the ensuing paragraphs.
There are wide range of reasons why I support the mentioned view. The foremost one is technical evolution of 21st century. After the Mega discoveries in computer science, we have variety of softwares, which makes our office works as well as household chores convenient. Instead of work with this, we have a robots, who can done our duty. So we have many choices available for the concern of making our daily routine easy.
A Further point in support is globalisation. With the globalisation, multinational companies are investing their money in advancing Nations; hence, the public of such nations have variety over choosing their employment sector. A good illustration of these is India. In India, people were chose agriculture as their profession in the past; whereas, now they have industries in their country. By this development, they can change their business and work as an employee in industrial sector.
However, I cannot say that we have different choices in each and every field. There are also some areas where we have limited choices. Firstly, we are still rely on petroleum products as a fuel of vehicles. Since the vehicles were emerged, they are still running with petrol or diesel. As other sources are not yet discovered. Although, scientist tries their best but they are not successfully made the engine which can operate by electricity.
In conclusion, in the modern society, we have wide range of choices in most of the fields. From working assistant to our employment sector, except some fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-27 | mardanpour | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- There are many things that motivate a person to work but money is the most compelling In your opinion how influential is the power of money 79
- Some people think that space research is waste of money To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- There are many things to motivate a person to work money is most compelling In your opinion how influential is the power of money 64
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a robot' or simply 'robots'?
Suggestion: a robot; robots
...ent. Instead of work with this, we have a robots, who can done our duty. So we have many...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'do' or 'be done'?
Suggestion: do; be done
...rk with this, we have a robots, who can done our duty. So we have many choices avail...
^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...culture as their profession in the past; whereas, now they have industries in the...
^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relied'.
Suggestion: relied
... limited choices. Firstly, we are still rely on petroleum products as a fuel of vehi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, still, well, whereas, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09059233449 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78475914793 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613240418118 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.74328981 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.5714285714 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231440433339 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622343035239 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655341779722 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122031070065 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299151377922 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.