large shopping malls are replacing the small shops
The importance of large shopping malls are replacing the small shops which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. However, the substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. So, this essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that nowadays, there has been tremendous increase in the number of shopping malls in many cities which have replaced many local shops. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that the richest people go to large shopping malls as well as the poor people only prefer to small shops because they have no money. Needless to say, all these merits are stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effect is that mostly people are prefer to malls because thay can get daily needs and malls earn a lot of income. Besides, the large shopping malls are very expensive as well as the small shops are cheaper. Hence, it is apparent why many are against in favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of large shopping malls are replacing the small shops in cities and towns are indeed too great to ignore.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-06 | Sridarani | 75 | view |
2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
2023-01-06 | Yuli | 84 | view |
2022-12-26 | woutan | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, so, thus, well, while, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88278388278 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44717705717 2.71678728327 90% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542124542125 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7470864811 50.4703680194 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.181818182 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458823821474 0.242375264174 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184044240051 0.0925447433944 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.210367557428 0.071462118173 294% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.333833113907 0.151781067708 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864929061201 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.