The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided column chart indicates the variation in the average prices of house in five various cities, New York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankurt and London in two spans of periods, from 1990 to 1995 and from 1996 to 2002 compared with that in 1989. As presented, during 1990 to 1995, the majority of these five cities had their house prices lower than that in 1989, while all cities significantly witnessed an upward trend in values of house except Frankurt.
According to the chart, the average prices of house in Tokyo were lower than that in 1989 throughout the given periods. However, there was a growth in the house prices from 1996 to 2002 than previous period (-5% and about -7% correspondingly, which was compared to 1989). Meanwhile, although the household prices in New York decreased by 5% in the period from 1990 to 1995 beside 1989, afterward, between 1996 and 2002, it sharply upsurged by at least 10%. Interestingly, London is the city starting at the lowest position in percentage changes in house value (well-under -7% in comparision with 1989), it skyrocketed by approximately 19% to reach its peak in following period.
Remarkably, between 1990 and 1995, the average property prices rised by 2% and 3% in Marid and Frankurt consecutively, but that in the period from 1996-2002 went up by 2% compared to the previous period in Marid, whereas that in Frankurt experienced a slow descending trend (around 1%).
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, well, whereas, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94560669456 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72135126369 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543933054393 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6020882349 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.857142857 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.1428571429 22.9334400587 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33814588717 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173936108614 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494737987487 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237784080445 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761237296074 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.