Government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country. Do you agree or disagree?
It is said that the government should pour more money into subjects related to science, in an attempt to boost a country's future development and process. Although this policy would bring enormous benefits to current society, I am absolutely convinced that the authorities should not neglect other subjects.
There are several reasons why teaching science-related subjects significantly contribute to national development. Firstly, Science & technology are the keys to leading a country to prosperity. It helps to boost production, healthcare quality, transportation and all other aspects of life. For example, electrical and computer-based technologies have become more and more popular at work, it has led to much more streamlined and efficient workplaces. Secondly, modern science is supplying renewable energy sources for humanity such as solar and wind-generated power, are beginning reduction dependence on fossil fuels.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that other subjects should not be ignored under no circumstances. The first thing, not all students like to study subjects related to science, they should be encouraged to develop their natural capabilities. To be more specific, having the fact that a number of students do not have a strong desire or ability to absorb knowledge of science subjects. Therefore, imposing these subjects on learners would carry negative effects on their growth. In Viet Nam, parents always want their children learning science-related subjects and this made their kids falling in the pressure of studying. According to statistics, every year thousands of young Vietnamese commit suicide due to the above reason. The second problem, undue focus on teaching science subjects creates imbalances in the workforce. This causes a shortage of labour working in non-science fields such as lawyers, journalists and so on.
In conclusion, though the great benefits that science brings, however, there are also disadvantages owing to the arguments presented above. I believe that if a governmental organization funding for a more well-rounded education, that country will grow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-22 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-19 | Nong Thao | 84 | view |
- Nowadays some employers think that formal qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010. 56
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005. 84
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.634375 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11574451135 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634375 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7659340378 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.058823529 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280101289217 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785161613373 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577669036025 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157852635625 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546917640101 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.