The graph shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the transportation of goods through various modes of conveyance including road, water, rail and pipeline in the UK form 1974 to 2002. Overall, the road transported the highest quantities of merchandise.
Merchandise transported by pipeline witnessed a gradual increase from minority quantities to approximately 25 million tones in 1996. Since then, this figure remained the same to 2002. The figure for rail experienced a collapse to 30 million tones, however, it covered by roughly 5 million tones before suffered from another fall. By the end of 2002, this figure went up significantly to 41 million tones.
Goods transported by water rose to its highest quantities of about 55 million tones. After experiencing a tediously rose and hence plunging by 5 million tones, this figure reached over 60 million tones of goods. Merchandise transported by road suffered from fluctuation. After fluctuating, this figure rose to over 80 million tones but soon declined to about 78 million tones. This figure reached its highest point in 1999 with 95 million tones and then increased gradually.
In conclusion, goods conveyed by road, water, rail experienced fluctuations with the exception of a gradual increase trend of the pipeline.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-10 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | nguyenanhkhoi1702 | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | nguyenanhkhoi1702 | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | Ly8 | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-03 | Anastasia0511 | 82 | view |
- The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 56
- The pie chart below show units of electricity production in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment D 67
- Many people nowadays see a counselor or therapist to improve their mental health Some feel however that this is unnecessary Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('tediously') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rose') instead of another adjective.
...ut 55 million tones. After experiencing a tediously rose and hence plunging by 5 million tones, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...d, water, rail experienced fluctuations with the exception of a gradual increase trend of the pipelin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39086294416 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98350226818 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522842639594 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9367484018 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12884182258 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666267923481 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720820052263 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102892954546 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944939741845 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.