TPO-44
The reading and lecture are discussing about the silver coin founded in native american archeologic site. the reading claims it is fake and brings 3 reasons to support it. However, in the lecture the lecturer refutes with all the reasons and explains why the silver coin is considered to be genuine coin by lots of archeologist.
First, she explaines that native american were used to travelling far distance. However, the text claims that far distance make the possibility of coin being real impossible because Norse might not move that much far from his settelment. In the lecture professor states that native american could travelled for great distances and having different objects from far away in their site is in favor of this. They could have reached to the Norse settelement and brought back the coin with them if they found it interesting.
Also, finding just one coin and no more than that was suggested in the text as the reason of being fake coin. However, the professor explaines that it not neccessarily means that it is fake as Norse might brought coins with him to north america but when he packed to go back home he might have taken all the siver coins and brought them when they returned.
Lastly, the speaker believes that Norse knew that north american were interested to unusual and attractive object. So, he might trade that with something with them because they might use it as a neckless or jewlery for themselves. This idea refutes the claim of the text that coin did not have any value for native american so having them would be useless.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ed in native american archeologic site. the reading claims it is fake and brings 3 ...
^^^
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun archeologist seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of archeologists'.
Suggestion: lots of archeologists
...oin is considered to be genuine coin by lots of archeologist. First, she explaines that native amer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'travel'
Suggestion: travel
...essor states that native american could travelled for great distances and having differen...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78966789668 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40721106373 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523985239852 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4645008037 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.166666667 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243895852045 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09842478749 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382328334219 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150277748806 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281224942582 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.