Wild animals have no place in the 21st century. Some people think that
preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern day, people have different views about natural species that do not have certain places and it would be wasteful to protect these animals. Although governments would take a significant amount of money to carry on actions to prevent these wild animals at the brink of extinction, an consideration on a long-term goal provides broad-based benefits to various sectors such as agriculture and economic development.
On the one hand, people have a misunderstanding concept about wildlife habitats. Firstly, it is undeniable that the appearance of those species plays a vital function on the earth. For example, the balance ecosystem help to maintain the diversity of flora, a great deal of human needs, especially the oxygen and atmosphere, comes from the forests. Secondly, there are no compelling reasons why should human let animals die out. Furthermore, it is attributable to the fact that people have enough space to settle their lives and the coexistence is necessary to maintain natural regulations.
On the other hand, there are a whole host of broad-based benefits from wild animals. In fact, local governments are able to make use of wildlife reverses to boost their economic growth. For instance, it is feasible to offer such ecotourism as watching birds in underprivileged areas. In addition, various wild species contribute directly to the medical development. For example, a wide range of medicines used to cure cancer and diabetes, which are manufactured from the venom.
In conclusion, the existence of the wild animals does more good than harm and the prevention of species’ dying out is urgent and necessary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-23 | nghialeminh | 61 | view |
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 93
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
- Task 1 The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 Age group Female Male 0 9 51 3 50 3 10 17 42 2 24 6 18 39 17 1 9 7 40 59 12 3 8 0 60 18 5 13 2 42
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century Some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ild animals at the brink of extinction, an consideration on a long-term goal provi...
^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
.... On the other hand, there are a whole host of broad-based benefits from wild anima...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26717557252 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01100287893 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599236641221 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0818654626 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.153846154 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260755908593 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766146739496 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676285155854 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154217240828 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536441406187 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.