Solutions to Make Our City a Better Place to Live
The past decade has witnessed the transformation of our city into a modern city. It is undeniable that this development process has brought us a lot of benefits such as more products to use, more jobs to do, and more entertainments to enjoy. However, the rapid development in recent years forces us to cope with some negative problems, and the significant one of these problems is the alarming rising amount of plastic waste. Because of its convenience and cheapness, we use more and more plastic in manufacturing and our daily lives without thinking about the fact that plastic is non-biodegradable and contribute to the pollution of our city seriously. It is about time we have to think of the solutions to this issue to make our city a better place to live.
The first solution to reduce plastic waste is raising the citizen’s awareness of how seriously the plastic garbage can ruin our city’s environment; and encouraging them to reduce, reuse and recycle the plastic waste. This action is crucial because we can only change our behaviors of using plastic products when we change our awareness and attitude. To put this solution into practice, the city authority need to organize campaigns, programs about this issue and also put it into school curriculum. In addition, as the local people, each of us should convince to our family members, our neighbors and our friends to try a zero plastic waste lifestyle.
Classifying waste to recycle instead of bringing all of them into landfill is another effective way to control this problem. The more plastic litters are recycled, the less amount of them ends up in landfills as trash. Although most of the plastic garbage is recyclable, the rate of recycling is now negligible as we do not sort our waste. The city’s authority has to make an effort to apply waste classification widely. Basically, we need to have a system of trash bins so that every household can put the waste into different categorizers and then the garbage trucks pick and bring the recyclable materials to the recycle facilities.
Moreover, raising more tax on plastic products can help us address our city’s problem. This financial method can lessen the amount of plastic waste in our city because consumers have a tendency to use less plastic products when the price of this material gets higher. For instant, if we must pay more money for plastic bags or containers when buying things in supermarket, many of us will reject using them and bring our own bags instead. In these years, many cities in the world has used this solution and got some positive results in decreasing plastic waste.
In conclusion, the increasing amount of plastic waste in our city is one of the serious issues that we have to deal with to help our city become a place worth living in. Raising resident’s awareness, sorting waste and raising more tax on plastic products are some of the possible solutions to this problem. Not only the city’s authority but also all local people should take responsibility for our better future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-26 | Anh Thi | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-06 | mehjabin | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Trinhmai2002 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | barkavi | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 260, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...aising more tax on plastic products are some of the possible solutions to this problem. Not...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 24.0651302605 224% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 41.998997996 176% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2539.0 1615.20841683 157% => OK
No of words: 515.0 315.596192385 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93009708738 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74139000391 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460194174757 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 803.7 506.74238477 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8553590455 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.904761905 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5238095238 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305957169162 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113328612795 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127458671874 0.0667982634062 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203707518675 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101654501706 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.