Some people say that it is more important for employers to consider academic qualifications rather than personal life experience and values when hiring an employee. Do you agree or disagree?
While some people believe that recruiters should choose candidates with high qualifications and good scores instead of considering their work experience and other personal values, I believe that, along with a degree, practical experiences can also prove the capability of applicants.
On the one hand, a degree can give recruiters more reliable and immediate evidence when choosing suitable staff for the company due to some reasons. Firstly, a good degree demonstrates that a person has a good academic background and has acquired the necessary skills and in-depth knowledge for a particular field. There are some jobs requiring employees to have high professional knowledge that can be only learned at universities, such as occupations in the medical or technological field. Secondly, the university environment also trains students’ essential soft skills which can be necessary for future jobs. For instance, most education systems in university create opportunities for students to take part in community activities to improve their teamwork skills or research skills, management skills, and so on.
On the other hand, I embrace the opinion that personal life experience and values are also important factors that most head hunters should consider before choosing suitable staff for their organizations. First of all, apparently, enrolling in a university and getting a degree seems to be easier for most students nowadays since there are more and more private universities established. This leads to a dramatic increase in the number of graduates with the same degrees. Thus, among a good many applicants having similar qualifications, in order to recruit the most competent employees, managers should take into account other outstanding strengths such as work experience and personalities. In fact, if a candidate has done part-time jobs or taken part in internship programs related to their majors, it is proved that whether they have passions and talents in such areas or not. Secondly, it is undeniable that some knowledge at university tends to be theoretical and scarcely relevant to practical jobs so most fresh employees need training before becoming official staff of companies. Therefore, hiring those whose experience is available helps companies to save time and cost to train them again.
Inconclusion, there are various reasons why some employers prefer people with academic qualifications rather than those who only have the life experience or good personalities and I think that it is a negative development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-27 | hoaithuongnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-27 | hoaithuongnguyen | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-19 | chaunguyen2707 | 56 | view |
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 78
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both the 61
- Some believe that people will purchase a product based on their needs and advertising is not needed To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions 84
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...save time and cost to train them again. Inconclusion, there are various reasons ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i think, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53213367609 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04855705988 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562982005141 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6669006523 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.714285714 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7857142857 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239153195903 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761560412661 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070877462718 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161874477602 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601468933172 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.