Modern societies need specialists in certain fields
Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not others. Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding.
Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages?
Today, big universities from all over the world provide hundreds of subjects for students who chose to study further and get a degree in a certain field. Many of this subjects transform students into specialists that are needed by society and other subjects are less relevant. Some believe that the government should pay university fees for those who chose a course that is useful to society. It is refuted that the number of the advantages of such an educational policy is bigger than the drawbacks.
First of all, free courses in certain fields could attract people who are unsuited to a particular field. For example, a student who enjoys studying foreign languages and hates Mathematics, Biology and Chemistry would definitely not have the necessary skills to becoming a doctor. But considering the fact that medicine would be a free course, they might tend to chose medicine instead of studying languages. Therefore, it is not an option for government to pay university fees, because this might lead to a society full of failed practitioners.
Secondly, having access to free courses would determine students to drop out more often than usual, or chose not to get jobs in the target subject. Take, for instance, students that pick a course, which they find out during the years of study they do not like, but because of the big amount of money they have paid for the course, they do not quit. However, if the courses were paid by the government, they would certainly drop out more easily, money being no longer a problem. From this, it can be concluded that such an educational policy is not the best solution.
Following the analysis of students unsuitable for certain fields and students dropping out because money would not be an issue anymore, it is clear that the advantages of such an educational policy do not outweigh the disadvantages. It is expected that such a policy will not be applied in the near future
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-16 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | oanhlilies | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-07 | Tường Vân | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | mpragnya | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...et a degree in a certain field. Many of this subjects transform students into specia...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03664921466 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6947486819 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46335078534 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6899531361 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.888888889 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183778759225 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076060190502 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148585806482 0.0667982634062 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101198538174 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851227478386 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.