The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.
The bar chart below illustrates the number of oil barrels which is manufactured among 6 countries as Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and UAE from 1990 to 2010.
It is clear that the total production of oil almost increased considerably in all nations except that of oil in Qatar. Specially, Saudi Arabia held the lion’s share of yielding oil among 6 countries in 2010.
At first glance, while the total manufacture of oil in Arabia accounted for the highest rank with 45 million barrels, Qatar is plunged into the bottom just at 2,5 million in that of oil. The rate of increasing oil production in Arabia had a significant growth over the period shown.
In addition, the capacity of oil manufactures in other nations did not have a remarkable transformation in the given chart with being total at 13 million barrels. Another noteworthy observation, the beginning state of UAE production remained unchanged at approximately 3 million barrels in 2000 and 1996. There is a modest growth with gradually 0,5 million in Iraq, UAE, Iran
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-05 | jadenguyen | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | hnhung | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-25 | vivitoben | 84 | view |
- The figures give information about economic growth and household expenditure across a range of categories 78
- The given table shows the actual and projected population of Argentina Indonesia Italy and Republic of Korea for the years 2003 2025 and 2050 45
- The given table shows the actual and projected population of Argentina Indonesia Italy and Republic of Korea for the years 2003 2025 and 2050 78
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84055757677 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0574496735 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190589441052 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087018989057 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478375462699 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126920341703 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462998201525 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.