Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that teaching children the literature of their own country should be given more importance than that of other countries. In my view, I disagree with this idea because I believe that both types of literature play a vital role in the development of children's knowledge.
On the one hand, learning locally written works gives children the opportunity to understand their own traditional and historical values in their home country. Take Su tich banh chung banh day as an example, this fairy tale helps kids to know about the main purpose of Tet holiday and how people celebrated Tet in the past. In addition, literature works such as folktales, poems or stories help ignite children's patriotism. For example, By reading Hich tuong si, children have the chance to learn about how their ancestors went through different challenges and even sacrificed themselves for the independence of VietNam. This helps remind them that they have to make every possible effort to preserve and protect the merits of forefathers.
On the other hand, placing any less importance on other countries' literature can form an incomplete understanding of the world. Different countries have different cultural practice and historical events. Through foreign literature books, they will provide students with in-depth knowledge about cultural and traditional values of different parts of the world. This can help them to avoid culture shock or other culture-related problems when they travel abroad or work in an international company in the future. Another benefit is that when children have literature knowledge domestically as well as internationally, they would be able to think from different perspectives to resolve a problem they encounter, from that raising decision-making and problem-solving skills.
In conclusion, for the aforementioned reasons, I am convinced that it is necessary for children to learn both local and international literature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-05 | Afdalah Harris | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | levanhoan123 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | doquytuan | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | deep Shikha | 92 | view |
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport However others think money should be spent on other priorities eg cost environment Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 89
- The ageing population is good for business the economy and society Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The charts show fresh fruit exports in 2010 67
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...d, placing any less importance on other countries literature can form an incomplete under...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4701986755 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08887689548 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579470198675 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.263880011 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.076923077 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257039951209 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966148136422 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121737631087 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166032737105 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145670909306 0.056905535591 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.