Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, friends play major roles in people's lives because they have a direct effect on most aspects of their lives. By considering this, some people are inclined toward the opinion that people should have the ability to find new friends readily whereas others hold exactly the opposite perspective. From my point of view, it is crystal clear that the ability to keep a friendship is much more important to have a happier life because not only can they recognize themselves better and have a better personality, but also the do not enter new challenges in their life, which engages their minds in a negative way as well. The following paragraphs will aptly elucidate my perspective.
To begin with, having long-term friendships enable people to be a better person. As a matter of fact, people spending their time with each other for many years, help themselves to recognize their negative personal behaviour and modify them. In addition, they know each other much better and they do not do somethings which make their friends sad. However, if they make new friends since they are not familiar with each other's personality, they say things which make their friends unhappy. As a result, if people keep their friendships for a long time, they will be happy because they are completely familiar with each other's personality.
Furthermore, it is established beyond doubt that on the one hand, some people believe that ability to make new friends makes people happier because they are able to have more friends with different kinds of behaviour, yet on the other hand, others believe that ability to making new friends takes are exposed them to challenges that they actually do not endure them. I firmly agree with the latter viewpoint, for I believe that the fewer friends people have, the more they are happy because they do not have to think about their friendships and how to run it in a good way. By way of illustration, a recent empirical conducted by Tarbiat Modares University, which catch you off guard, reveals that a high percentage of people having a few friends are the ones who are happier their mind is not engaged with different issues regarding friendships.
To wrap it up, according to the above-aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that having small group friends making them happier for a long time inasmuch as in the first place, they can help each other to identify their bad characteristics and remove them, and in the second place, they do have to think about new challenging issues which engage. their mind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
- Nowadyas people do not need their parent for help 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People holding different view cannot achieve success as a team 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting that from your peers. 37
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children now are often required to spend most of their free time doing homework participating in school organized activities or exercising however children should do whatever they want to do in their f 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 523, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...and have a better personality, but also the do not enter new challenges in their life,...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 596, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n their life, which engages their minds in a negative way as well. The following paragraphs will ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...s since they are not familiar with each others personality, they say things which make...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... they are completely familiar with each others personality. Furthermore, it is esta...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Their
...ut new challenging issues which engage. their mind.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, so, well, whereas, in addition, as a matter of fact, as a result, to begin with, in the first place, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94626168224 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63415799111 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467289719626 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.96574822 48.9658058833 216% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 162.846153846 100.406767564 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.9230769231 20.6045352989 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.3076923077 5.45110844103 299% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25843386544 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107518752844 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576553310756 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171201352691 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587533028343 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.