Some people believe that face to face communication is always more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.
Communication is a crucial and routine activity followed by all. Communication, either verbal or written has its importance, but it is the belief of many that a face to face communication is always more effective compared to its written form and I certainly agree with this notion. This essay will further discuss why talking to a person is more powerful then texting them.
Firstly, having a conversation with a person face to face is pristine, concise and has merits over the other form of communication. When two individuals or a group of people have a discussion, they can see the expression and watch the tone of voice used by another person, which eliminates the chances of misunderstanding. Often a written text or a document can be interpreted differently by people and cause dispute which could be avoided in a verbal conduit. Also, making a phone call instead and having a straight conversation rather than beating around the bush on text message is another advantage of having direct communication.
Secondly, effective communication is required for the betterment of society, socially and economically. Indeed, a bunch of stapled papers are needed to run the world economically, but for the warmth of human companionship, it is essential to meet a person and share a talk with them about their day to day life. For example, after a long tiring day of work, it is very comforting to reach out to your spouse and talk about your day rather than receiving a love note.
In conclusion, face to face communication must be preferred over written communication when it tends to leave a mark on a person socially, whereas, written notification is useful only to bound laws and make rules.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-28 | Rachana91 | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | navid_ghanizadeh | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | Wheezydino | 54 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | Janvi Sindha | 74 | view |
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 71
- Some people think that spending a lot on holding wedding parties birthday parties and other celebrations is just a waste of money Others however think that these are necessary for individuals and the society Discuss 78
- Many people say that the only way to guarantee a good job is to complete a course of university education Others claim that it is better to start work after school and gain experience in the world of work Discuss 78
- Some people believe that face to face communication is always more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and include relevant examples 73
- Many people say that the only way to guarantee a good job is to complete a course of university education Others claim that it is better to start work after school and gain experience in the world of work Discuss 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...hy talking to a person is more powerful then texting them. Firstly, having a conver...
^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve a mark on a person socially, whereas, written notification is useful only to b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95087719298 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10438088368 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571929824561 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8909554731 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.272727273 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250117039609 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889249831493 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781429011916 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156706168824 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875242250968 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.