Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
The field of critics has always been prosperous. From the esoteric prose of ancient literature savants to the transient pop songs on the billboard, the critics have shaped the public's understanding on so many fronts. The prompt suggests that the critical judgment of work is only valuable when it comes from professionals. In my opinion, I mostly disagree with this claim and argue that while it is true that most experts are good at giving impartial judgments but they are not unassailable.
To begin, the reason why experts are being called experts is that he or she has a more authoratative insight regarding the topic because of the time he or she has put into the subject and the consequent more comprehensive knowledge than the mass public. In fields of serious literature, arts, and science, it is also important that the critic receives enough of the approval from his contemporaries. For instance, for comtemporary arts, it is often regarded by the mass public as difficult to understand while in the mean time once it is endorsed by some portentate in the area, the price will just sky-rocket. Obviously, it is because the public recognize value of the endorsement of an expert which indicates an expert critic's judgment have a pragmatic value of shaping the public opinion.
However, the expert's opinion might seem plausible at the time being, it does not ensure its timelessness. For instance, the pop art tycoon Keith Harring has made early success in his career in Newyork where he later opens his own shop, a shop that sells products like t-shirts, mugs, or framed photo print of his works. This conduct of relating art with retail industry is, as in the mind of Keith Harring, a way of conveying access of the then deemed sanctimonious art to the mass public. At the time, most of the main stream critics criticized his doing and maintained that it is not the right way and it would decrease the artistic value of his work. On the contrary, this practice later proves to be a major success, both commercially and artistically, and made Harring one of the most influential artists of our time. The above example illustrates that the expert's opinion may not always proves to be true and we should be smart enough not to blindly follow everything they say.
Finally, in terms of value, there is a standard for a general one while there is also an individualized one. For instance, it is a common practice for many of us today to look for commentary on websites like IMDB and other forums for both lengthy and short comments to look for others’ opinion on the film. While there maybe experts composing verbose articles on the picture, we also unintentionally look for short comments by random people that feels the same way we do on certain scenes or a unforgettable character. The satisfaction of finding people who feel alike or notice a certain detail sometime have more of a emotional value than reading a whole passage of a comprehensive anatomy of the picture one just watched. From this instance, we can say that with a different definition of value, the expert’s opinion is not always necessary and one is encouraged to have his or her own standard.
In conclusion, it is a true complicated issue. From the example shown, there are compelling reasons for the existence of experts’ judgements on many fields. Their opinions sometimes are valuable in nurturing a conducive majority opinion. One the other hand, their opinions may not be applicable in all instances. In drawing from both sides of the argument, it seems more plausible to conclude that experts’ judgements are not always right and individual are free to judge whatever they feel like.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | barcelona433 | 83 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Zahid6400 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | wopona8219 | 75 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field 66
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time 83
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 722, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'critics'' or 'critic's'?
Suggestion: critics'; critic's
... of an expert which indicates an expert critics judgment have a pragmatic value of shap...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...ng the public opinion. However, the experts opinion might seem plausible at the tim...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 863, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
... The above example illustrates that the experts opinion may not always proves to be tru...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 493, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the same way we do on certain scenes or a unforgettable character. The satisfacti...
^
Line 7, column 619, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... a certain detail sometime have more of a emotional value than reading a whole pa...
^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are sometimes
...dgements on many fields. Their opinions sometimes are valuable in nurturing a conducive major...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3063.0 2235.4752809 137% => OK
No of words: 627.0 442.535393258 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88516746411 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00399520894 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7975500046 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 308.0 215.323595506 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491228070175 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 963.9 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3146695961 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.625 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95833333333 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188247245791 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587652962522 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689104321507 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115686461298 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729523122369 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 100.480337079 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.