Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government，while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The increase in the number of young individuals holding important positions in the government has been capturing significant public controversy, raising questions of their qualifications. Despite the suggestion prioritizing old candidates, young ones should be entitled to top-tier positions in the government.
On the one hand, the authorization of young individuals to managerial positions could lead to positive outcomes. First, young official authorities are more bound to employ innovative and flexible national policies compatible with their nation’s resourses than the older counterparts due to their constant exposure to foreign education programmes along with social struggles from other nations. This means that national social problems could be addressed with more advanced and efficient approach, ensuring social harmony and national advancement. In addition, since young individuals are proved to be more open-minded and less prejudiced, some subjects which are against traditional social norms could be perceived with less conservative mentality, acting as an incentive for a more liberal society. For example, some European countries whose legal protections and social welfare for individuals of hetero nonconforming sexual orientation are stipulated in codes or even constitutions are managed by considerably young governments, discouraging any discriminatory and extremism-based assaulting acts targeting at such community.
On the other hand, it is true that influential positions are supposed to be exclusive to old participants. Specifically, if young people who was associated with inadequate expertise and immature cognition stemming from intermittent exposure to actual social affairs are entitled to managerial governing positions, specialized and knowledge-based decisions could be reckless and sentiment-based. Consequently, state governance would be fraught with corruption and individualism, suggesting an inevitable correlation with social unrest and political turmoil.
In conclusion, young people should be authorized to important ranks in governments. Despite the issue concerning with their qualification, it could be addressed with more specialized training and intensive social interaction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-04 | camille1104 | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-15 | bfun | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-04 | dnthao2932018 | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-24 | nkninh | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-31 | xinyu961121 | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
- The diagram below gives information about the Mont Blanc road tunnel and the Seikan Railway tunnel 62
- Now big cities have many problems. What are these problems? Do you think the government should encourage city residents to move to small cities and towns? 78
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007. 78
- Global environmental issues are the responsibility of rich nations not of poorer nations. Do you agree with this opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in the government. On the one hand, the authorization of young individuals t...
^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... important ranks in governments. Despite the issue concerning with their qualific...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.36513157895 5.12529762239 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44317084494 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.5625635331 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.25 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176454156198 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778740116259 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585560926713 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117272065907 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126378261612 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 13.0946893788 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 12.26 50.2224549098 24% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.8 11.3001002004 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.96 12.4159519038 161% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.32 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.