Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Opinions are divided on whether young people are suitable to work in the critical sector in the government. I believed the young should be given the chance to take on such positions and the more experienced ones should not take the position for themselves.
Granted one might argue that vital seats in the government should not be given to young people. This is predicated on the assumption that experienced people have enhanced decision making skill compared to their younger counterpart. To illustrate, in the military, the commander must have experiences over a long period of time in battles in order to control the army and make critical decisions. Another reason that contributed to the said argument is that younger people often lack the ability to manage large scale resources such as human resources. One example is that in an international corporation, the majority of human resources managers are of age since they have to gather good relationships as well as workers’ trusts so to drive a big company.
On the other hand, young people ought to have the chance to take on this position due to their innovative thinking and rapid adaptability. Firstly, younger people are more creative in terms of coming up with ideas, for instance in building the city’s infrastructures, the young have suggested having better school in the suburbs so that children could have a better learning environment. Consequently, the graduation rate among non-city dwellers has rocketed, thus opening up more career paths for them. Secondly, young people are likely to adapt to circumstances more quickly compared to those of older age. Like in the case of the latest pandemic, young students had encouraged the practice of wearing facial masks by taking advantage of social networks. Through a viral video illustrating the protection that facial masks bring, everyone was more aware of the item importance and began to wear masks.
In conclusion, although some government positions could not be taken on by the youth because of their lack of experiences, they should have an opportunity to try out these positions given the fact that they are more creative and adaptive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-04 | camille1104 | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-15 | bfun | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-04 | dnthao2932018 | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-24 | nkninh | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-31 | xinyu961121 | 61 | view |
- The plan below shows the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year https i0 wp com how2donow com wp content uploads 2021 06 south jpeg w 819 ssl 1 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugarcane https i0 wp com howtodoielts com wp content uploads 2021 06 test 2 jpg fit 670 2C784 ssl 1 61
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- It is not necessary for people to travel to other places to learn about the culture We can learn as much as from books films and the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ander must have experiences over a long period of time in battles in order to control the army...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14164305949 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8319318589 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558073654391 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8451252611 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.642857143 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2142857143 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302592605068 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101203906272 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815127906209 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183774504102 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883655484941 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.