The graph below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of people having their own car per household in the UK over a period of 36 years.
Overall, As can be seen from the graph, the number of car owners increased during the period. In particular, Britain’s household without a car declined significantly while that with one car was the most common situation.
In 1975, nearly half of the UK population had one car while people with no car took up a smaller percentage, at approximately 30%. These figures both declined over the following ten years, to around 37% for people having one car and 23% for those with no car. Over the next 20 years, while the percentage of families owning one car rose again gradually, finishing the period at nearly the same value as in the beginning, households without a car continued to decline to just under 20%.
At the beginning of the period, families that owned two or three cars were approximately 7% and 3% respectively, and both experienced increases over the next 10 years to around 13% and 5% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | chau hoang | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Raspreet | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | Wulan | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | Manjinder_kaur | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | nguyen thanh sang | 67 | view |
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 2012 82
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 61
- Fossil fuels coal oil and natural gas are the main sources in many countries However in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy wind and solar energy are encouraged Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80555555556 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83602813025 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594444444444 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.92015018 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171749244516 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952867220225 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445026176979 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111135096195 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466508531345 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.