Many people say that universities should only offer to young students with the highest marks, others say they should accept people of all ages, even if they did not do well. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
In today’s society, the top priority has been given to higher education due to its significance in individual growth and social progress. Under this circumstance, there is a major debate in the field of taking parts in universities that revolves around the issue of whether only students with high marks are qualified for the entrance or all students, regardless of ages and academic performances should be offered places. This essay will delve into both viewpoints and voice my personal opinions.
On the one hand, it is admitted that top students deserve to be trained by reputed universities as they have already made much more effort than other peers in schooling. Hence, those students can easily adapt to the curriculums of the universities which require a certain level of background knowledge to excel in specific courses or complete numerous assignments. Moreover, candidates with ill scores are not reliable for further performance in study, it may be a loss of resources and time working with such pupils. To enumerate, the biggest reason for the low score of such students is distracted mind and can be predicted to keep distracting further and be the loss to the educational institute and society, so a more focused and better performer is well suited to this case.
On the other hand, I personally maintain that students who do not achieve better scores but have wonderful performance in overall development despite their ages, genders, religions can get the opportunities to broaden their horizons in higher education. For example, over-age students who can not gain decent marks but have a lot of life experience can absorb knowledge at the University in a comprehensive and practical way. Meanwhile, some top students graduating from high school are not yet aware of their abilities and dreams can enroll in fields that are not suitable for them in college.
In conclusion, I believe that superior performance in the academic study must be a crucial factor to evaluate the qualification of a student who can enter the university, but more all-round standards should be adopted. Apart from high scores, other qualities such as teamwork spirit, interpersonal skills, organizing ability, and specialty in one field are of equal importance in enrollment standards.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22010869565 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93871390274 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592391304348 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8854855933 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.083333333 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14657248885 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516152055894 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442141532024 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088257197802 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269362265195 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.