The table below shows the percentages of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features.
The chart compares the percentage of 7 different functions of smartphone played by users in 2006, 2008 and 2010.
It is clear that making a phone call was by far the most popular function for mobile phones but it was had a little drop from 2006 to 2010. Recording video was the least common features among the seven functions using by owners in 2008 but it was used far more in 2010.
In 2006, 100 per cent people would use their phones to make calls while the second and third most popular uses of mobile phones were sending and receiving text messages (73%) and taking photos (66%). By contrast, less than 20% of mobile phone users would play games and play music on their phone, and there was no record for users searching the Internet or recording video.
In the following 4 years, except the percentage of making calls dropping from 100% to 99%, the figures for the other 6 features using by owners were increased from 2008 to 2010. During this time, more users searching the Internet than playing games on the phone in 2010, with the number of 73% and 41% respectively. Meanwhile, although the function of playing music used by more and more people over the years, the percentage of it (26%) was overtaken by 35% of recording video in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-14 | ililmaidatuz | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | Shohru_x | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | Taytor2609 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | minhtran224 | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-19 | Forhad Hossain Rabbi | 73 | view |
- In some culture children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
- Some people believe that the range of technology available is increasing the gap between the rich and poor in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view What can wealthier societies do to help poor people 78
- The best way to reduce air pollution is for the government to raise the cost of fuel petrol 84
- Is relating well to others more important than studying hard 63
- In many countries people have children later in life than in the past Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages What is the cause of this 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58928571429 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23391001477 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513392857143 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.6211851727 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266448361227 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123944689261 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629628544721 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162190221424 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832166054477 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.