It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of Studying a film in schools and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the link between films and study is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the relationship between films and lessons can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning literature for students can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of learning improvements, as well as literature developments, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered literature studies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both learning analysis and learning requirements apparently can be seen.
Within a realm of science, importance of literature learning by film might increase the consequences of the correlation between films and learning. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the balance between literature learning and films could relate to this reality that the demerits of learning strategies pertain to literature policies. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of learning issues is correlated negatively with the role of films. Hence, it is correct to presume preconceived notion of literature learning improvements.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using film for better learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of educational films prove the significance of educational environments, but also pinpoint learning regulations implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-10 | Behnaz fallah | 93 | view |
| 2020-11-10 | Behnaz fallah | 80 | view |
| 2020-10-05 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-07-06 | aidasadr | 88 | view |
| 2020-07-05 | Gohar Khan | 72 | view |
- As E books are available online these days the value of printed books has diminished Agree or disagree 85
- What s global problems and how the government should solve them 85
- Students with degree earn high salary than who doesn t have Some say that they have to pay the full cost of their courses Give opinion 80
- In town and cities the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop Do you agree or disagree 85
- What s global problems and how the government should solve them 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78136200717 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31858610065 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605734767025 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3749795149 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.416666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276223156801 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984739628403 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511458926268 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152703527546 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356777642704 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.