The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.
The bar chart gives information about the proportion of divorce between two countries in Europe, Finland and Sweden, during the period 2011 to 2015.
Generally, while Finland enjoyed an upward trend, the other country, on the other hand, fluctuated but its tendency is downward
To be specific, as can be seen in from the given chart, the divorce rates in Finland was on an increase during the period shown. Although suffering from a slight diminish by roughly 5 per cent in the beginning year, the divorce rates in Finland dramatically shot up to a record high of over 40 per cent in 2014. However, the biggest percentage that can be recorded was in the subsequent year.
On the other hand, regarding the number of unmarried couples in Sweden, it has shown a completely different picture. Used to be outnumbered Finland in 2011 by the ratio of 45 to 35, the divorce frequency in the country of Sweden quickly rocketed to its peak of approximately 50% in the following year. From then on, the figure fell back again and hit the bottom at below 40 per cent in the last researched year
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- discuss both the positive and negative aspects of mobile phones 56
- Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they released from prison What do you think are the causes of this What possible solutions can you suggest 67
- some say that because many people are living much longer the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- More and more people work from home and student will study at home if computer technologies become cheap and accessible What will be the advantages and disadvantages will happen 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fluctuated but its tendency is downward To be specific, as can be seen in from t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69109947644 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60173077829 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596858638743 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5124549364 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239243693624 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101453694118 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111399537236 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147082540576 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128209177248 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.