Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside.
Do you agree or disagree?
The issues related to transportation and accommodation has, for a long time, become a matter of controversies and a nerve-wracking topic for urban planning throughout the world. Then, several people suggest that relocating colossal enterprises and manufactories together with their staffs to the rural areas can be an efficient measure to tackle this problem. From my perspective, I find no justification against this brilliant recommendation
To initiate, there is a variety of explanation to support alternation in sites of companies and factories. One fundamental advantageous impact of its on solving traffic hassles is that it will diminish the volume of traffic within the metropolises these days. It does not seem unreasonable to claim that the overwhelming of traffic congestion as well as the excessive occurring of accidents in the roadway is mainly due to the fact that infrastructure in these cities cannot meet such a heavy demand from an enormous amount of vehicles commuting on the daily basis. Therefore, moving large institutions to suburban areas or other regions out of the cities will make a great contribution to reducing the pressure on urban lanes as the vehicle circulation no longer need to take place inside these megacities
Concerning the dwelling issues, the redistribution of enormous organisations is obviously synonymous with freeing a large proportion of these apartments previously occupied by employees from large firms and their families. Consequently, city apartment blocks will plunge in price and certainly escalate in availability. This allows people from middle or lower-class to have their own accommodation for an affordable price. Furthermore, as the majority of workers will flit to a new place with the aim of being close to the workplace, housing scarcity problem can be solved simultaneously
In conclusion, due to the aforementioned reasons, it is reasonable to combat the traffic and housing problems through relocating enormous enterprises, their manufactories as well as their workers to the suburban areas and the countryside
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-07 | Khanhu010101 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | hieu13092006 | 52 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
- Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce goods To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal 84
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live 56
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 88
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 588, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity problem can be solved simultaneously In conclusion, due to the aforementioned...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54545454545 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35829595892 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595611285266 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 124.440773755 49.4020404114 252% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 196.555555556 106.682146367 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.4444444444 20.7667163134 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208798883719 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680537242847 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071074073953 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12266303724 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514669244691 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.4 13.0946893788 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.49 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.