The chart below shows the number of films produced by five countries in three years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart compares the status of movies produced by five different countries over a period of three years starting from 2007 until 2009.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that country A made the highest number of movies across the given time period except for the last year when it witnessed a steady decline as against other countries who showed a reverse trend.
According to the given illustration, the whole distribution was led by country A, who started with more than 85 films that got leveled off in the following year. Despite a slight dip of 9 movies in 2009, country A maintained the status of a leading producer. However, a contrasting trend was observed in the case of country B, who produced nearly two-third of movies as created by A in 2007, observed a steady rise in the next year and finally saw a significant increase to a peak value of 70 by the end of the period.
On the other hand, although countries C and D experienced a slight uptick over time, the former produced 19 movies in the final year as opposed to the latter who fell behind by nearly 5 movies. Further, challenged by few fluctuations, country D slipped down to just 9 movies in 2008 but managed to recover initial status of producing 15 movies in 2009.
- A bar graph on time 16 to 24 year olds spent per week on sports and exercise by gender in England 84
- The table below shows the results of a 25 year study on the use of bicycles in Britain by age and gender 89
- The graph above compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web 73
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, third, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66960352423 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65166037824 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5859030837 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.4988297946 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.428571429 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4285714286 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174810094526 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872368673385 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045008989764 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121004783381 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372563519705 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.