The chart below shows the number of films produced five countries in three years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of films produced five countries in three years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The vertical chart below represents how many films are published in five nations between 2007 and 2009.
It is obviously transparent that country A reached a peak throughout 3 years.
In terms of first facet, country A ranked the first with the equivalent figure at 88 movies in two first years. Nevertheless, it is observed to decline inconsiderably by less than 10 at 80 films. Country B ranked the second with differential number compared to country A. In 2007, a number of films of country B were not twice as high as of country A ( at 50). Since 2007, it ran a higher risk of experiencing the slight climb and in 2009 when the number standed at the level of 70.
With the regard to 3 remained nations, country C and E saw the stable increase. In country C, it underwent the clear upward whereas country E went through an indistinct growth. In constrast, country D had a fair oscillation pointing out at 13 flicks in 2009.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-09-06 Drake004 89 view
2022-01-28 ngannguyen2408 78 view
2020-07-28 pris 78 view
2020-07-28 pris 78 view
2020-07-28 pris 78 view
Essays by user ngannguyen2408 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...B were not twice as high as of country A at 50. Since 2007, it ran a higher risk ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55089820359 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78975089014 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622754491018 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 15.0119952038 43.030603864 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.0 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157398609082 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673680282055 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521465886216 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945647948989 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367587567128 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.