Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, especially since social media and TVs have been improved, advertising has been playing an important role for selling goods. This has led some people to believe, buyers have just concentrated on adds not their needs. Although this statement could be true, this essay is going to talk about writer’s opinion which could be called as an approximate agreement.
First of all, the role of advertising could not be denied not only by producers who have wanted to sell their goods with satisfying profit, but also for people who have not liked wasting their money for invaluable things. These days, where actually people have been watching TVs and also websites like YouTube, producers have had to release expanded advertisement which has made their goods public. Moreover, individuals especially children, who could be encouraged easily, have been stimulated to buy the goods. The More exciting ads to be produced, the more consumer will be the actual buyers. In other words, the fact which people’s mind could be deviated from their actual needs by seeing some interesting ads could not be neglected.
Additionally, producers and financial sponsors of the goods which have been advertised, definitely have not wanted to take a critical risk which have been thought as failure work. So the reason why I can be disagree with the mentioned opinion is the fact that society’s needs have been watched by those people. As a result, they would not produce something which would not have a successful future. Consequently, the famous goods with multiple ads have been people’s requests in a particular time which could be not only in the past, but also in the future. For example, watching some advertising about smart phones with so many modern virtues, could be inane for the past, but in these days, they are human’s desires.
In conclusion, although advertisements have been an essential factor to sell goods, they are not the only element. According to writer who do not totally concur with that view, advertising could change people’s idea about buying things but they have been produced based on what society wants.
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplaces Others think that the true function of a university should be to given access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the cours 73
- Is technology time consuming or does it save time 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extend do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 89
- The manufacturing and use of cars damages the environment but their popularity is increasing Why is this How could this be controlled 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14613180516 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62426956482 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521489971347 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1880725998 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.733333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114905277013 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494108967677 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320471521239 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846707123824 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404524005089 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.