In many parts of the world amount of garbage (rubbish) is increasing.
What are the causes of this?
What are the possible solutions?
There is no doubt that the piles of garbage are surging at an alarming rate around the various parts of our globe. The most obvious reason seems to be the negligence on the individuals' part; however, this problem is not insurmountable if the government could take some effective measures against littering.
The prime cause of the increased amount of garbage could be that the individuals do not respect their environment, and are not aware of the negative effects of littering on it. They do not bother to dispose of their waste properly, and think they could easily get away from it. As a consequence, there are piles of garbage, and once these piles have started other people begin to contribute to it without any hesitation. This negative trend does not allow them to think about its negative consequences on their environment. It is a common sight, for instance, in India where people throw their waste on the streets rather than using the litter bins.
Nonetheless, this situation could be tackled if the government could implement stringent laws. This would instil fear in citizens' minds, and could act as a deterrent against littering. Street cameras, to exemplify, should be installed to caught them in act and hefty fines should be charged. As a result, it would force those irresponsible citizens to behave responsibly by producing less waste, and eventually the amount of garbage would decrease.
In conclusion, the individuals' negligence could be considered the chief reason for the piles of garbage; nevertheless, the regime could change their behaviour by introducing harsher rules and regulations. If both the people and the government have acted sensibly, the nature would have been at its utmost beauty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-11 | singla_mba2007 | 67 | view |
- Some believe that technology such as mobile phones cell phones are destroying social interaction Do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people think that every individual is responsible for their own healthy lifestyle Others believe that governments should take care of it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 53
- You and your brother made a holiday plan recently for a week but he will not be able to accompany you Write a letter to your friend in which explain the holiday plan explain why your brother will not able to join Invite the friend for this trip 68
- In many parts of the world amount of garbage rubbish is increasing What are the causes of this What are the possible solutions 67
- Adults do very less exercise these days Some people think that showing sporting events on the television such as Olympics and World Cup tournaments can be the best way to encourage adults to do exercise Others believe there are other effective ways to do 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...e would decrease. In conclusion, the individuals negligence could be considered the chie...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14539007092 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80097177515 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3757507692 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.615384615 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.093032785004 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354486144399 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041786802975 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0564804935869 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349599239824 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.