Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views.
Up to now, a major factor contributing to the development of medical is testing on animals. However, in recent years, it become a controversial issue among communities as creating two conflicting flows of opinion which are agree and disagree with this issue. Today, both of these views will be discussed in this essay.
To begin, many naysayers hold the view that animal testing violates the rights of humanitarian and leads to the extinction of some species. First of all, using and killing animal to serve research purposes is harsh and cruel, going against with humanitarian rights. From that, many animal lovers criticize this action and claim that animals deserve to live their lives rather than become specimens to be tested in labs. For example, dogs and cats are friends of human, not product to conducts experiments. Apart of from, many experiments with the help of animal testing still have been failed. It means that the sacrifice of these animal are nonsensical for human-beings and we abuse and count on this method too much, aim to find medicine or other purposes
However, some people still support for this action because of its necessity for human life. First of all, Research can lead to new treatments and save lives thank to animal testing. For example, many vaccines has been studied and invented to save the lives of thousands people until now, such as vaccines for Corona viruss conducted by russia. In addition, almost of animals used in research are mices and rats which reproduce quickly and have many similarities with some process of human, but most importantly, it often is harmful animal. Second, it is imperative for drugs to be tested, aiming to prevent the side effects before releasing it to the market. For example, most of comestic products are tested on animals to make sure safety for human..
To sump up, it is unquestionable about the significant of testing on animals in medical sector, though how inhuman it is. In the near future, we should take in consideration for some alternative options for that.
- Advertising Fast food Some people against and some are not Discuss both view 84
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different countries 67
- The graph below shows the diferences in wheat exports over three different areas 67
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 78
- The average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line services 2001 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
...n animals. However, in recent years, it become a controversial issue among communities...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
... conflicting flows of opinion which are agree and disagree with this issue. Today, b...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ree and disagree with this issue. Today, both of these views will be discussed in...
^^
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: APART_A_PART[2]
Message: Wrong collocation. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: Apart from
...n, not product to conducts experiments. Apart of from, many experiments with the help of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is often
...cess of human, but most importantly, it often is harmful animal. Second, it is imperativ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 750, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...on animals to make sure safety for human.. To sump up, it is unquestionable about...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, for example, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97667638484 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61374124157 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577259475219 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7781969736 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22929075136 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730569129583 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426364902986 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12582933149 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650066521567 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.