It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example.
Recently, the phenomenon of studying a film at schools to learn literature and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that matters of agreeing to study a film at schools are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning literature can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, studying a film at schools can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of hard-working children, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered the importance of educational films. Thus, beneficial ramifications of studying literature are visible.
From a scientific point of view, learning literature can provide the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inefficient schools are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described lazy children. Hence, predicted outcomes of time-consuming films are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning literature by studying a film far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of learning literature prove the significance of important films, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-04 | yasamin62 | 80 | view |
| 2020-08-13 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2020-08-13 | Alireza.r.m | 11 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2020-03-14 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
- The importance of travel seems to be overrated Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home Travel is important for education To what extent to you agree or disagree 85
- Extreme sports Dangerous activities like skiing bungee jumping rafting diving should be banned Agree or disagree 85
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects Do you agree or disagree Give examples from your experience 85
- While artificial intelligence becomes so advanced people can use computers to translate foreign languages Do you agree with it Use examples or your experiences 82
- Is hosting the Olympic Games bring any benefit to the host countries 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70689655172 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32772020456 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612068965517 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7650679038 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.363636364 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334419360601 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115066294977 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633516762538 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19038306057 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582182023642 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.