It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example.
Recently, the phenomenon of studying a film at schools to learn literature and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that matters of agreeing to study a film at schools are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning literature can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, studying a film at schools can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of hard-working children, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered the importance of educational films. Thus, beneficial ramifications of studying literature are visible.
From a scientific point of view, learning literature can provide the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inefficient schools are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described lazy children. Hence, predicted outcomes of time-consuming films are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning literature by studying a film far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of learning literature prove the significance of important films, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-04 | yasamin62 | 80 | view |
| 2020-08-13 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2020-08-13 | Alireza.r.m | 11 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2020-03-14 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them Give your opinion and discuss your views 77
- What roles should governments companies and individuals play to combat climate change 88
- Increasing the price of fuels is the best way to solve pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 88
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature To what extent you agree Give example 88
- Students should be banned from computer and online gaming at school as they have no educational values Do you agree or disagree Give examples 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70689655172 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32772020456 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612068965517 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7650679038 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.363636364 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334419360601 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115066294977 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633516762538 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19038306057 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582182023642 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.