"According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the last year. Clearly, the content of these reviews is not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not in the quality of our movies but with public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater quantity of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."
The argument has stated about a recent report from marketing team of that there has been a drop of people who have attended the Super Screen movies from previous year. In addition, the reviews by critcs have not deterioted from the past year. Thus, the viewers have lack of awareness about such good quality of films.Super Screen must allocate greater share for advertising and reaching the public sight.The argument stands specious for number of reasons
First of all, the passage has open up with strong notion that there has been a drop of people who have attended the Super Screen produced movies. The author has assumed about the lack of attendees of a movie. There could be possibility that there have been a greater demand of a movie overseas. The author has not provide a numeric data to distinguish the number of people who have attended the movies last year versus this year. Without any appropriate data, the notion is subjected to fallacy.
Second of all, the passage has another notion that the positive reviews about specific Super Screen movies have increased during the past year. In addtion, the reviews have not reached to our prosective viewers is the claim of the speaker. There could be possibility that the reviews of the movie has been considered by the viewers and they have decided not to watch the movie because of the clash of other movies with Super Screen production. Understanding our quality of movie would be difficult so they would have preffered other movies than Super Screen movies.Thus, there isn't enough data to vallidate this claim as justified.
In addition, the author has stated that increasing the budget of advertising can make the viewers considered to watch. The author has inudated with vague terminalogies about the increasing the advertising budget. There is possibility that there has been greater budget from last year about the advertisers than previous year when there were more people to watch Super Screen production movies.
In conclusion, without lucid inforamtion about the numeric data about the viewers from last and previous year, reviews to watch the movie and increasing budget for advertising stands dubious.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 16 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | rubelmonir | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Mizanur_Rahman | 50 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | tedyang777 | 60 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | barath002 | 58 | view |
- Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 50
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children s schools 50
- Technology causes more problems than it solves 33
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 75
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Super
...reness about such good quality of films.Super Screen must allocate greater share for ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...vertising and reaching the public sight.The argument stands specious for number of ...
^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...of a movie overseas. The author has not provide a numeric data to distinguish the numbe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...d other movies than Super Screen movies.Thus, there isnt enough data to vallidate th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...es than Super Screen movies.Thus, there isnt enough data to vallidate this claim as ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 358.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10335195531 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49903230233 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 204.123752495 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.396648044693 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 552.6 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.4510577494 57.8364921388 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.8 119.503703932 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 23.324526521 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.70786347227 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419944226249 0.218282227539 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156096249775 0.0743258471296 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118405380376 0.0701772020484 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240273051979 0.128457276422 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103799660027 0.0628817314937 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.3799401198 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.3550499002 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 98.500998004 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.9071856287 151% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Super
...reness about such good quality of films.Super Screen must allocate greater share for ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...vertising and reaching the public sight.The argument stands specious for number of ...
^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...of a movie overseas. The author has not provide a numeric data to distinguish the numbe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...d other movies than Super Screen movies.Thus, there isnt enough data to vallidate th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...es than Super Screen movies.Thus, there isnt enough data to vallidate this claim as ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 358.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10335195531 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49903230233 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 204.123752495 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.396648044693 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 552.6 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.4510577494 57.8364921388 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.8 119.503703932 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 23.324526521 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.70786347227 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419944226249 0.218282227539 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156096249775 0.0743258471296 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118405380376 0.0701772020484 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240273051979 0.128457276422 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103799660027 0.0628817314937 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.3799401198 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.3550499002 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 98.500998004 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.9071856287 151% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.