It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
agree?
A habit of reading is far better than watching television to develop one's skill of imagination. I completely agree with this because of the following reasons.
Firstly, while reading a book, the person appears to be more creative. A reader always makes his brain to work by thinking and visualizing the content he or she read. For example, when a book of crime story is read, the reader enjoys the moments by thinking about the characters and scenes of that particular situation. This thinking power is the result of the work done by the reader's brain. In other words, a habit of reading opens the possibilities of imagination in a human mind and helps the reader to be more creative and intelligent. Moreover, in reading a book's content, the reader goes through most of the book's words, which helps to build useful vocabulary and language skills. This habit helps develop the qualities of an individual and shape the reader into a better person.
On the other hand, watching TV kills the possibilities of creative development and makes the viewer lazy. While watching a television program, the person does not need to imagine and visualize the scenes, which are already there. There is no need to improvise any instance like what people do while reading a book or article. Besides, watching TV cultivates laziness and promotes a sedentary lifestyle among the viewers, which causes deadly health issues such as obesity. This trend is a severe threat to human lives who are now becoming victims of watching TV and other digital platforms for longer hours. Other than instantaneous visual information, TV is of no use in developing personal attributes like creative and linguistic skills.
In conclusion, reading is preferred to watching TV, as a useful habit for developing language skills and creativity among individuals. Reading content always refreshes the brain and its abilities, whereas prolonged staring at TV screens can only harm our health. It is hoped that the younger ones concentrate more on reading to TV to develop their attributes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-28 | parabshreyas | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-22 | appu161 | 70 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | appu161 | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | Ronald88 | 75 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | rekharastogi | 66 | view |
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be effected on society 61
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it 73
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 89
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it 61
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ter than watching television to develop ones skill of imagination. I completely agre...
^^^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a book' or simply 'books'?
Suggestion: a book; books
...e and intelligent. Moreover, in reading a books content, the reader goes through most o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and intelligent. Moreover, in reading a books content, the reader goes through m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0796460177 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76761884378 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53982300885 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9264908087 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273789758127 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866892572365 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638096101409 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185668340278 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614842165898 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.