In many countries the rich are becoming richer and the poor are becoming poorer. Why is this a problem? What solutions are there to tackle this problem?
Money is the major segregator of the population around the world. Although there are many developed countries on this planet, nothing can change the fact that economic disparity prevails everywhere, questioning the definition of “developed”. This essay will provide an insight into why the wealthy are getting wealthier while the impoverished are worsening, and suggests few methods to bring a change.
For starters, It can be debated that a person’s fate exists in his lineage. Men and women who are born in high society have an absurdly luxurious upbringing along with a constant emphasis on how to multiply profits. This inculcates a “do whatever it takes” attitude to stay rich and become richer, leading to a corporate dog fight amongst the top players. For instance, one can easily find the Ambanis topping the Forbes list of the wealthiest Indians many times, despite many others who are similarly wealthy. Obviously, perks of being super reach can extend both ways i.e. by acquiring successful businesses and curb stomping the competition.
Unfortunately, such an attitude can totally affect the lower class. Cheap labour with underpaid wages and ill maintenance of their well being is a commonality in many industrial societies. Meanwhile, the economically down societies like farmers and construction workers are constantly exploited due to their ignorance. Some measures are already being taken abroad which deserve a mention. Some of them openly advocated their willingness to donate for charitable reasons. To exemplify this, Bill and Melinda foundation have shared their fortune to enrich and empower many lives all over the world by promoting vaccination, Sanitation and Education .Meanwhile, government can recheck it’s taxation protocol to fundamentally balance the economic disparities prevalent in our societies. Quality Education needs to be available to everyone, so that the talented and hardworking ones can eventually prosper and give back to the society.
To surmise, A broad minded approach for a global development in the richer class while a drive to succeed in poorer class by improving literacy through studious efforts can help eradicate poverty.
- Education is not a luxury but a basic human right and as such should be free for everyone irrespective of personal wealth Do you agree or disagree 56
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 56
- Some people feel that giving aid to poorer countries has more negative impact than positive Do you agree 73
- The pie chart on number of consultations doctors had in 2005 78
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ng vaccination, Sanitation and Education .Meanwhile, government can recheck it’s t...
^^
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Meanwhile
... vaccination, Sanitation and Education .Meanwhile, government can recheck it’s taxation p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 683, Rule ID: IT_IS[10]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (=it is)?
Suggestion: its
...tion .Meanwhile, government can recheck it’s taxation protocol to fundamentally bala...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us efforts can help eradicate poverty.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56676557864 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94167519739 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682492581602 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6833160247 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134790299897 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353666048681 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523275587725 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785038027241 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373468870228 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.