‘Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity.’
How far do you share this viewpoint?
It is often said that everyone should contribute a certain portion of their income towards charity. It seems to me that forcing everybody to donate is not a good idea and I will explain why in this essay.
First of all, not everyone can afford to give away a fixed chunk of their income for donation. This is because they themselves might be struggling to meet their ends. The prohibitive cost of living and child education do not leave enough savings for many families. It will be therefore very difficult or even impossible for them to contribute towards charity. Furthermore, people need to save for their retirement. The elderly years bring along challenges related to health and finance. Thus some people might prefer to save for themselves so that they would be able to live their retirement with dignity without being dependent on their offspring or the government.
It is true that receiving charity can improve the lives of people living under poverty. However, the donation should come from people who can afford to donate and it should definitely not be by enforcement, rather it should be from one’s own willingness to help.
To conclude, the increased expenses of daily lives and the need to save for one’s own retirement does not leave enough money for most citizens to donate. Hence it might be an injustice to force them to give away a fixed amount to support charity. It seems more logical that people should be motivated to donate based on their own ability and circumstances, rather than a general view that “everybody” should donate a “fixed amount” of their income.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-31 | kunalchavda99 | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-31 | kunalchavda99 | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-23 | ashfaqmemon | 56 | view |
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys an girls in separate schools Others however believe that boys and girls more from attending mixed schools Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Nowadays many people complain that they have difficulties getting enough sleep What problems can lack of sleep cause What can be done about lack of sleep 84
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants Other countries have no intention of doing this Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your own conclusion on 78
- Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity How far do you share this viewpoint 56
- The friend of yours is thinking of going on a camping holiday for the first time this summer He She has asked for your advice Write a letter to your friend In your letter 1 why you think your friend would enjoy a camping 2 Describe some possible disadvant 81
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...allenges related to health and finance. Thus some people might prefer to save for th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ough money for most citizens to donate. Hence it might be an injustice to force them ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94095940959 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64413223985 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542435424354 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.265881191 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6428571429 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241321546191 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814623236024 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696670391634 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1583852878 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046978279044 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...allenges related to health and finance. Thus some people might prefer to save for th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ough money for most citizens to donate. Hence it might be an injustice to force them ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94095940959 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64413223985 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542435424354 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.265881191 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6428571429 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241321546191 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814623236024 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696670391634 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1583852878 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046978279044 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.