The graph below shows the cinema attendance of people on different days of the week in 2003, 2005 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The provided graph demonstrates the number of attendees paying visits to theaters for recreational activities from Monday to Sunday in the three given years, namely 2003, 2005, and 2007.
Looking at the graphic, it is immediately obvious that Saturday and Sunday gained more popularity than other weekday counterparts and the ratio of people going to cinemas underwent an upward trend.
As is shown in the chart, Monday, stood at the least proportion with nearly 8% in 2003, continued to gradually decline, in particular, to 7% for 2005 and 6% for 2007. Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, correspondingly, shared a marginal decrease from 9%, 10%, and 11% to nearly 7%, 8%, and 10% respectively in the next 2 years, before climbing slightly to 10% for 2007.
Now, turning to another detail, holding the largest share with 26%, in the beginning, Saturday registered a constant increase and reached its peak at 29% in the year 2007. In comparison, Sunday, the second-appealing time for movie lovers, shrank to roughly 21% and stabilized at the analogous rate until 2 years later. Friday remail unchanged during the three surveyed years with 16%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-04 | Viru Patel | 69 | view |
| 2021-03-04 | Viru Patel | view | |
| 2020-08-26 | Cowy | 59 | view |
- The graph below shows population variation in three wildlife species from 2011 to 2016 in North America and its coastal areas Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries 89
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other while others think that people have become more independent 89
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education center in the year 2009 89
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, so, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16129032258 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87312149894 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672043010753 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1040506643 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.142857143 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0992154433201 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430346665091 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336000749706 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.060788647929 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273866122275 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.