The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015.
The column chart illustrates how much of waste being collected by a recycling centre over five consecutive years, starting in 2011.
Overall, while the figure for the paper was consistently the highest from 2011 to 2021, and from 2014 to 2015, the majority of waste in 2013 belonged to glass. In addition, throughout these years, the waste garden was always the least among the four categories.
As can be seen from the column chart, the paper was the most waste collected by the recycling centre in 2015, which accounted for 70 tons. Next, came the number of paper in 2011, at 57 tons, which was 17 tons as large as that in 2013, at 40 tons. Also, the figures for waste paper collecting in 2012 (50 tons) and in 2014 (51 tons) were marginal. Besides, the 2011-2015 period witnessed moderately oscillation of just under 6 tons in the number of waste glass.
Regarding the last two kinds of waste, the number of collected waste tins hit the lowest point of 27 tons in 2007; whereas, that of other years were fluctuated slightly, such as 35 tons in 2011, 34 tons in 2013, 33 tons in 2014, and 39 tons in 2015. Consequently, the number of waste garden reached a peak of just 35 tons in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not the best place to find information 84
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 73
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history 89
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52314814815 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41128160488 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532407407407 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9446697561 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.555555556 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331054584119 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157586746902 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107087690923 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225191034642 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750945142026 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.