Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Choosing a university is not a trivial decision. Students spend most, if not all, of high school working sedulously to maintain the highest GPA, racking up the most unique extracurriculars, and maintaining a remarkable rapport with teachers in the hopes that a great recommendation letter, and ultimately, a stellar university acceptance, will be the fruits of their labor. The prompt suggests that students from lower-income households who have secured admissions into universities should not have to pay any university tuition. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this suggestion and argue that universities consider the needs of their prospective students in order to give these students an opportunity to explore their interests and start a career.
It is no secret that a university education often requires families to save up money for years, perhaps decades, to provide for their children's tuition fees. Often, students coming from low-income households do not have the privilege to be provident and create a savings account. It is not uncommon for families to live from paycheck to paycheck, squandering just to make sure that everyone at home has food in their bellies and a roof over their heads at night. For instance, in the United States, children from lower and middle-income households cannot afford tuition at 95% of the universities in the country. If students were to apply to colleges purely from an affordability perspective, that would leave them with a very small pool of choice, in which case they would still have to consider other factors which may be unfavorable such as distance from home, an abundance of educational opportunities within their fields of interest, and diversity. The example above illustrates that students are often not in control of their academic potential when they come from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Even if students were to consider taking out loans and grants to afford college, they could potentially land in a situation worse than one in which they started, unable to repay hundreds and thousands of dollars in debt ten years down the line.
Further, education should be provided to students who have earned it through their own merit, simply for the sake of equality; there are many cases in which intelligent students cannot go to university because they are poor, and lazy students can go because they are rich. In an age where unskilled labor jobs are being hastily replaced by Artificial Intelligence, it is imperative, now more than ever, to increase levels of specialization for students in lower-income households. Free education for lesser privileged students would be encouraging them to learn tasks that cannot be merely done by a robot! In failing to do so, wealthier students would be left to progress in fields like technology, while the unskilled laborers end up unemployed as their jobs fizzle out before they inevitably become obsolete. This is simply a case of the rich becoming richer, while the poor become poorer. Consider the case of grocery store clerks who are slowly being eliminated as their jobs can be performed meticulously by automatic scan-and-stack machines, with little to no human interaction, and in almost less than half the time of traditional employees. Lower-income students are not provided with the same flexibility and opportunities as children whose families are financially stable, and as a result may eventually have no other option but to forego higher education, increasing the gap between the rich and the poor.
While it is true that not all governments may not have the means to fund higher education for all students who cannot do so themselves, in making university free, countries are merely investing in their own future. Many jobs today require very specific knowledge; making university free will not only provide equal opportunities to students across the socioeconomic spectrum but will make society better equipped to handle the challenges of tomorrow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-10 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | nigarsafarova | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Afolakemi | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | s.sim | 62 | view |
- nutrias 61
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 83
- texting or calling 70
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 82
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing a 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
...aintain the highest GPA, racking up the most unique extracurriculars, and maintaining a rem...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, while, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 94.0 58.6224719101 160% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3349.0 2235.4752809 150% => OK
No of words: 637.0 442.535393258 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25745682889 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02382911018 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96782277495 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 332.0 215.323595506 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521193092622 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 1061.1 704.065955056 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.6482224232 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.263157895 118.986275619 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5263157895 23.4991977007 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203156887171 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732694833383 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591609025558 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141131235614 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192893486605 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 14.1392134831 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 48.8420337079 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 100.480337079 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.